AQA English Language Paper 2 Question 4: compare with evidence

Move from spotting techniques to explaining how two writers convey different perspectives.

Plan a relationship, not two lists of devices

Start with the shared focus: the bustle of the beach. Then make each quotation earn its place.

Source ASource B

Irritated by intrusive, relentless noise.

Delighted by lively, welcoming activity.

“factory of noise” makes the beach seem like impersonal, continuous production rather than rest.

“invitation” makes the shouts welcoming: the writer feels drawn into a shared experience.

The bustle alienates the writer.

The same bustle connects the writer to other people.

Original worked example

An explained comparison paragraph

Suggested wording

Both writers describe a busy beach, but A finds its energy oppressive whereas B welcomes it. A’s metaphor ‘factory of noise’ makes the sound seem relentlessly produced, turning a place of leisure into something impersonal and exhausting. The radios ‘competed’, suggesting that each sound fights to dominate rather than contributing to a pleasant atmosphere. By contrast, B describes each shout as an ‘invitation’. This presents other people’s noise as a welcome to join in, not an intrusion. The phrase ‘burst into life’ also associates the crowd with vitality. The same bustle therefore separates A from the crowd but makes B feel part of it.

Why this helps

The opening gives a precise comparative idea. The explanation follows the meaning of selected words rather than stopping at technique labels. The final sentence draws the two interpretations together. Notice that ‘factory’ and ‘invitation’ need not be the same method: their different meanings help explain the contrasting perspectives. This paragraph develops one comparison; it is not a complete response to a full exam paper or a promise of a mark.

A planning and checking routine

Try this flexible practice routine; it is not an AQA-mandated formula.

  • Pin down the focus

    Underline what you are comparing. Write a precise attitude for each source, checking it against the whole text.

  • Pair a meaningful idea

    Choose a relationship such as enthusiasm versus disappointment, or shared concern expressed with different intensity. Avoid forcing a contrast the evidence does not support.

  • Select and explain

    Choose short supporting details from both texts. For each, finish the thought: this choice presents the subject as… and therefore suggests the writer feels…

  • Make the connection visible

    Use a comparative sentence that says what differs or overlaps. “Similarly” or “whereas” helps only when the idea after it is specific.

  • Check your reasoning

    Have you answered the printed focus, used both sources, explained how the writing conveys the views, and supported each interpretation? Replace a device-only sentence with an explanation.

Support and clarity

Frequently asked questions

Straight answers to the questions people ask most often.

Do I need an introduction and conclusion?

Choose an organisation that makes your comparisons clear. A long introduction that repeats the question does not develop evidence. A brief opening comparison can lead straight into explanation; use a concluding sentence when it adds a useful connection rather than repeating everything.

What if I cannot name the technique?

Describe the writing choice accurately and explain its meaning. For example, explaining why “invitation” makes the noise welcoming is more useful than inventing a technical label. Methods include word choice and organisation, not just figurative devices.

Can I use the same paragraph for every topic?

Use the reasoning process, not the wording. Identify the actual attitudes and select evidence that supports them. The beach paragraph cannot answer a question about different sources merely by replacing a few nouns.