AQA GCSE English Literature 8702 • England

AQA GCSE anthology poetry comparison

Choose a studied poem that answers the question, compare the poets’ methods and turn your notes into a connected argument.

Current answer

Start with the question, then choose the poem

To compare studied anthology poems, choose a second poem that gives you something precise to say about the question. Build a shared argument, select short evidence from both poems, then explain how their language, form or structure produce similar or different views. A useful comparison connects ideas and methods, rather than listing two poems’ features.

This guide covers AQA GCSE English Literature 8702 in England, Paper 2 Section B, using the current specification. The worked example uses Ozymandias and London from Power and Conflict. If you study another cluster, apply the comparison method to your own poems. Other boards have different tasks. For unfamiliar poems, use our separate GCSE unseen poetry guide.

What the AQA anthology task asks you to do

AQA currently offers Love and Relationships, Power and Conflict, and Worlds and Lives. Study all 15 poems in your chosen cluster and be ready for any of them. Check which cluster your class studies before using practice questions.

Two studied poems

Answer one comparative question on one named poem printed in the paper and one other poem from your anthology cluster. Choose from the cluster you have studied. See the AQA task outline.

A closed-book comparison

The named poem is supplied; the full text of your chosen second poem is not. Revise both short quotations and accurate references to important moments.

Ideas, methods and context

Section B carries 30 marks: AO1 12, AO2 12 and AO3 6. Develop an informed response with textual evidence, analyse language, form and structure, and connect relevant context to your interpretation. See the Section B specimen mark scheme.

Choose for the exact focus, not just the theme

Practice question: Compare how poets present the power of rulers in “Ozymandias” and in one other poem from Power and Conflict. This is a teaching example, not an AQA past-paper question.

  • Underline what needs comparing

    Here the focus is the power of rulers. A poem about natural power might offer a contrast, but you must explain its relevance to rulers rather than drifting into a general essay about power.

  • Test a possible partner

    Try William Blake’s “London”. You can connect the king’s ruined monument in Percy Bysshe Shelley’s “Ozymandias” with the palace associated with suffering in “London”. Both allow a focused discussion of political authority.

  • Check the evidence you can explain

    Before choosing, recall one precise moment, one method and one difference. If you remember only that both poems are about power, your connection is still too broad.

  • Write the relationship in a sentence

    For this example: both poems challenge rulers’ power, but Shelley exposes its eventual collapse while Blake presents its continuing human cost. This becomes a provisional argument to test against the texts.

Build a grid that already contains an argument

The grid gives three possible comparisons. Check each detail against the full poems. Notice that the final column explains the relationship rather than simply saying “both use imagery”. Read the full poems in the AQA anthology, printed pages 21–22.

Comparison focusShelley: OzymandiasBlake: LondonWhat the comparison shows

Rulers’ authority

The inscription calls the ruler “king of kings”. The grand title asserts superiority.

The speaker links the soldier’s suffering to “palace walls”. The building can represent royal authority.

Both connect power with a public symbol, but one ruler boasts while the other is seen through suffering.

What challenges that authority

“Nothing beside remains” follows the boast: the surviving words promise power that the scene cannot deliver.

The image of blood running down the palace walls links political authority to the soldier’s pain.

Shelley makes the claim to greatness look futile; Blake makes authority appear implicated in harm.

Voice and movement

The ruler’s claim reaches us inside a traveller’s account, then gives way to the empty landscape.

A first-person observer moves through the city, repeatedly encountering distress.

Distance makes the king an object of scrutiny; the walk makes suffering feel widespread and immediate.

Turn the grid into a linked argument plan

Organise by the ideas you want to prove. The following plan is one workable choice, not a compulsory paragraph formula. Each part draws on both poems.

  • Opening argument

    Both poems challenge political authority. Shelley presents a ruler whose claim to permanence has failed; Blake shows the damage associated with authority in a living city.

  • Develop the public symbols of power

    Compare the boast on the statue with the palace image. Explain why the inscription and the building matter to the poets’ presentation of rulers.

  • Develop the challenge to power

    Link the turn from the boast to the ruined landscape with the movement through suffering in London. Ask whether the poems offer distance from oppression or keep the reader close to it.

  • Reach a supported judgement

    Return to the difference: a ruler can lose the power he claims is permanent, yet authority can still cause suffering while it lasts. Make the ending follow from your evidence rather than adding a new topic.

Practise choosing, then test your paragraph

Use your class anthology and a practice question from the resources below.

  • Change the focus

    Try a question about the effects of conflict instead of rulers. Reconsider your partner poem and argument; do not reuse the power paragraph unchanged.

  • Rebuild one row from memory

    Close the anthology and note evidence for both poems. Reopen it to check words, speakers and the position of each detail. Correct uncertain quotations before practising again.

  • Check your explanation

    Underline each link to the question and circle each method you actually explain. If you have merely named a device, add what it suggests in this poem.

  • Ask for focused feedback

    Show your teacher the question, your poem choice and one paragraph. Ask whether the second poem fits the focus and whether your evidence supports the difference you claim.

Support and clarity

Frequently asked questions

Straight answers to the questions people ask most often.

Must every paragraph alternate between the poems?

No single sentence pattern is required. You can develop one poem’s idea before moving to the other, provided the relationship remains clear. Planning by comparative ideas can help you avoid writing two separate mini-essays followed by a brief comparison at the end.

What if I cannot remember the exact quotation?

Use an accurate textual reference rather than inventing words in quotation marks. Describe the specific moment and explain its relevance. Precise short quotations are useful for analysing word choices, so practise checking and recalling them alongside the poem’s wider movement.

Should I prepare one poem to compare with everything?

That is a fragile strategy: the question’s focus may not fit your prepared argument. Revise the whole cluster you study and practise choosing between plausible partners. For each choice, test whether you can explain a relevant similarity or difference using evidence.

Sources and references

Sources and references