Latimer Tuition | Pay as you go after lessons; no sign-up fee or long tie-in. Published typical ranges are £20–£30/hr for subject specialists and £25–£50/hr for qualified teachers, examiners or lecturers. | Live one-to-one online tuition with direct family–tutor contact after introduction. | Latimer says tutors are reviewed before going live and must hold an Enhanced DBS check with the Children’s Barred List. | Needs can be included in the matching brief; suitability remains individual-tutor evidence, not a provider-wide specialist claim. | Free 15–30-minute introduction before paid lessons, not a free teaching trial; no obligation to book a shortlist. | Our top pick for guided matching, visible choice and low commitment. |
Tutorful | Marketplace model with prices shown on tutor profiles. Tutorful’s published wording says online lessons start from £20/hour. | Platform booking and online classroom. Tutorful’s safeguarding page says online lessons are recorded and messages stay on-platform. | Tutorful says tutors are handpicked and background checked, with only 1 in 8 applicants accepted. Parents still choose the individual tutor. | Strongest visible additional-needs structure in the comparison, including SEN, autism, dyslexia and dyscalculia pathways. | Tutorful’s first-lesson promise says: “Not happy with your first lesson? … we’ll pay for your next one with a new tutor.” — Tutorful | A strong default marketplace for school-age tuition when parents want visible profiles, platform tools and additional-needs filters. |
Tutor Hunt | Directory and marketplace model. Families compare tutors through the site and should look at the tutor rate plus any platform fee before booking. | Online whiteboard with two-way video, screen sharing and document upload; the safeguarding page says online lessons are recorded. | Tutor Hunt says tutors have Enhanced DBS checks, references, ID checks and onboarding. Its safeguarding page also gives under-18 parent/guardian expectations. | Less explicit additional-needs structure than Tutorful in the published evidence used here; judge fit by individual tutor profile, qualifications and experience. | Tutor Hunt says: “If you are not satisfied with your tutor we will refund our fee.” — Tutor Hunt | Families who place high weight on recorded online lessons and explicit website-level vetting claims. |
The Profs | Managed, premium-style tutoring service. The published pages checked support its positioning, but not current prices or package fees. | Managed matching across school-level, GCSE, A-level, IB, admissions and wider academic support. | The Profs says it accepts a small proportion of tutor applicants and searches its tutor network for fit. | Potentially helpful for families wanting high-support matching, but the published pages checked do not support a blanket SEND-specialist claim. | No current trial or guarantee wording is strong enough in this comparison to quote. | Parents who want managed support, selective tutor matching and are comfortable checking current pricing before enquiry. |
Superprof UK | Broad marketplace with a Student Pass model. Superprof terms refer to a “monthly subscription fee of £39” and say it “is automatically renewed after 30 days”. — Superprof terms | Large intermediary marketplace. The tutor-student relationship may stay on-platform or move outside the platform by agreement. | Superprof terms place more responsibility on students or parents to verify tutor information and relevant checks. | Very broad tutor choice, but suitability is tutor-by-tutor rather than a platform-wide specialist pathway supported by the provider evidence. | Many profiles show a first lesson free, but this should be treated as common rather than universal. | Parents who want broad choice and are willing to check fees, tutor credentials and renewal terms carefully. |
MyTutor | A notable market option, but this comparison has limited current first-party detail on pricing. | Known as an online tutoring brand, but this comparison does not rely on detailed lesson-platform claims because current first-party detail was not complete enough. | Confirm MyTutor’s current tutor-selection, interview and safeguarding wording on its official pages before relying on it. | The checked provider evidence does not support a strong platform-wide additional-needs pathway. | No current provider trial or guarantee wording is strong enough in this comparison to quote. | An also-considered brand for parents who want another major online tutoring option, but not a full recommendation here because current first-party fee, safeguard, vetting and tutor-switch evidence was incomplete. |