Consider this invented practice passage:
Every evening, Mara laid two cups on the table. Every evening, she drank alone.
A starting response might say, “The writer uses repetition to show sadness.” It names a technique and an emotion, but leaves the connection unexplained.
The repeated opening, “Every evening”, makes the action habitual. Setting out two cups suggests an expected companion; “alone” breaks that expectation. The narrator describes Mara’s actions without naming her feelings, so the reader has to interpret them.
A more developed response could be: “The repeated opening makes Mara’s evening ritual feel like an unbroken routine. The contrast between the two cups and her drinking alone suggests that she keeps a place for someone absent, allowing the reader to infer longing from an ordinary action.”
That reading stays close to the words. Claiming that her partner has died would go beyond the evidence given. In a full passage, later details might strengthen or change the interpretation.
For a follow-up, change the second “Every evening” to “Tonight”. The second action now singles out one evening instead of repeating the same time pattern. Explain how that changes the sense of routine, then try the method on a fresh passage: select a choice, explain its effect and test the interpretation against the rest of the text.