For the course assessed through 2027, Paper 1 includes evaluating a source’s value and limitations using its origin, purpose and content. That means connecting who produced it, why it was produced and what it says to the historian’s question. The revised 2028 paper asks students to use source content, context and perspectives in answering an inquiry question.
Here is a constructed practice exercise. These short sources are fictional, rather than extracts from a past paper.
Source A: a minister opening a public works project tells an audience, ‘Our policy has given every family lasting work.’
Source B: local officials write in a confidential report, ‘The project employed 120 people in two towns for six weeks.’
Inquiry: how far do these sources support a claim of lasting employment?
A weak response is: ‘A is biased, so B proves the policy failed.’ This dismisses one source and asks the other to prove too much. The public speech is useful evidence of how the minister presented the policy. Its purpose may encourage a positive account, and it provides no employment totals. The report describes temporary jobs in two towns. It cannot establish what happened nationally or whether those workers later found other work. Confidentiality alone does not make its contents accurate.
A stronger response would be: ‘The speech presents employment as a lasting success, while the report records only a brief local scheme. Together they show the government’s claim and a limited account of implementation. They do not establish a lasting national result.’
Now change the inquiry to how the government promoted its policy. Source A becomes direct evidence for that question. A useful follow-up is to explain that change in the source’s value without simply labelling it reliable or unreliable. In course practice, add the relevant historical context and follow your paper’s actual question wording.