Edexcel GCSE History · Source usefulness

GCSE History source questions: evidence and usefulness

Use source details, provenance and knowledge of the period to explain what the evidence reveals.

Editorial

Lead authorRobin GibbonsFounder & CEO·Latimer Tuition
Reviewed byHeather LatimerTutor Matching & Customer Service·Latimer Tuition

Note

How to answer a source usefulness question

Explain what the source helps you find out about the specific enquiry, then test that value using its content, provenance and your contextual knowledge. A useful answer connects these elements: it does more than copy a quotation or label a source reliable or unreliable.

This guide focuses on Pearson Edexcel GCSE History (1HI0) in England, especially the source-utility task in Paper 1. The worked extract below is fictional and is used to practise the method.

In Paper 1, Question 2(a) is worth eight marks and asks about two sources. Work through each source’s usefulness in turn; comparison is not required. The single-source exercise here is partial practice, so it is not a complete answer to that two-source task. See Pearson’s current Getting Started guide.

Connect content, provenance and context

Keep the enquiry in view as you annotate. Each note should explain why a detail matters to what you are investigating.

Element	What to look for	What to explain
Content	A specific statement, detail or feature of the image.	What does this show about the enquiry? Avoid retelling everything.
Provenance	Who produced it, when, for whom and for what purpose; its type or nature.	How do those circumstances affect the evidence this particular source offers?
Contextual knowledge	A precise relevant fact from the period you have studied.	Use it to explain, support or qualify a source detail. A separate paragraph of recalled facts does not evaluate the source.

Fictional classroom source

Practise evaluating a source

Enquiry: how useful is this source for investigating difficulties in evacuating wounded soldiers on the Western Front?

Invented provenance for this exercise: a stretcher-bearer writing a private letter to his sister from the Western Front in 1916. Neither the writer nor the letter is a historical source.

“We carried one wounded man towards the dressing station. Our boots sank into the mud and we had to stop repeatedly. By the time we arrived, other men were waiting to be carried in.”

Use the supplied provenance for this exercise. The invented passage is for practice and must not be cited as historical evidence.

For genuine historical context, the National Army Museum’s account of Eric Hall’s diary describes stretcher bearing in mud and rain on 20 October 1916. The invented letter above is not an extract from that diary.

Annotate the source before writing

The enquiry is about difficulties in evacuation, so select evidence about moving the wounded rather than trying to describe the entire war. Pearson does not require a limitation in every usefulness answer. Avoid generic complaints that a source leaves things out; no source contains everything.

Select a detail
Underline “boots sank into the mud”. It gives evidence of difficult ground slowing the carrying team; it does not by itself establish a delay across the whole Western Front.
Connect relevant knowledge
The British sector of the Western Front historic-environment topic includes terrain and transport difficulties and the evacuation route. Knowledge of mud and damaged terrain helps explain why moving a stretcher could be slow and physically difficult. The chain included aid posts, dressing stations, casualty clearing stations and base hospitals; the example considers only one part of evacuation.
Explain why the provenance matters
The imagined writer is a stretcher-bearer describing a task he carried out. That would give him direct experience of carrying difficulties. Explain this connection; “he was there” alone is incomplete.
Consider a relevant limit, if it helps
A letter about one journey cannot establish how often every unit experienced the problem. Its family audience might also affect what the writer chose to include, but the caption alone cannot prove that he lied or concealed a particular detail.

Note

Move from a label to a supported judgement

Weak response: “The source is useful because it is a primary source. It is reliable because he was there. It says there was mud.”

This lists labels and a detail without explaining the source’s value for the enquiry. Being contemporary does not make every statement accurate or every source equally useful.

Stronger reasoning for the fictional extract: “The source would be useful for investigating practical difficulties in evacuation because the writer describes boots sinking into mud and repeated stops while carrying a wounded man. This suggests that the ground slowed the stretcher team. Knowledge of the Western Front’s terrain and transport problems helps explain this difficulty. As a stretcher-bearer describing his own journey, the writer would have direct experience of this stage of evacuation. However, one account of one journey would not establish how common such delays were across the front.”

The improvement is the chain of reasoning: detail → what it reveals → relevant knowledge → the value and limits of this writer’s perspective.

Plan the answer source by source

Use this checklist to plan your answer around the exact enquiry and sources supplied.

Underline the enquiry
Write its focus in a few words. Keep returning to it when deciding which evidence to include.
Choose content evidence for each source
Select a short quotation or precise visual detail, then explain what it reveals. Avoid copying long extracts.
Add knowledge that changes the explanation
Use a relevant fact to explain, support or qualify your selected detail. Leave out background that does not help evaluate usefulness.
Connect provenance to that evidence
Explain why the creator’s position, timing, audience or purpose matters here. Do not attach a generic sentence about all diaries, photographs or newspapers.
Give a supported judgement for both sources
When asked about two sources, address each. Explain each source’s value for the enquiry; do not spend the whole response on the first or turn it into a contest to pick a winner.
Check the reasoning
For every “useful”, ask “useful for finding out what, and why?” Remove unsupported assumptions about honesty or motives.

Note

Sources and interpretations need different questions

In the Edexcel assessment, source questions ask you to analyse and evaluate evidence about the period in its historical context, including later reminiscences by participants. Interpretation questions concern later accounts of the past and may ask about differences, why interpretations differ, or how far you agree with a view.

Read the labels and command words on the paper. Do not automatically apply a source-provenance paragraph to an interpretation task. For example, explaining that two later accounts stress different causes is a different job from evaluating what a contemporary letter reveals about evacuation. Being written later does not by itself make an interpretation wrong.

The date alone does not settle the distinction: a participant recalling an event later can still provide source evidence. Follow the paper’s labels and assess the task it sets.

Note

Use your own board’s paper for the next attempt

Choose a released question for the topic you study and obtain its source booklet and mark scheme together. Plan independently, write the response, then check whether each judgement is supported by source content, relevant knowledge and explained provenance. Ask your teacher to identify the weakest link if you cannot see why a paragraph falls short.

For AQA GCSE History (8145), use AQA’s own assessment guidance. Its Paper 1 Section B has a two-source usefulness task worth 12 marks; Paper 2 Section A has a single-source usefulness task worth eight marks. Source and interpretation tasks are arranged differently from Edexcel. The thinking about evidence can help, but this Edexcel-focused guide is not an AQA question-by-question formula.

Record one specific correction in your revision error log, such as “explain why the author’s job matters to this enquiry”. Then practise it with a new source. For help distinguishing task demands, read exam command words explained.

Frequently asked questions

Straight answers to the questions people ask most often.

Do I have to compare which source is more useful?

Follow the wording of the question. In Edexcel’s “How useful are Sources A and B” task, explain the usefulness of each source for the enquiry. Do not assume you must rank them or replace evaluation with a list of similarities and differences.

What if a source is a photograph rather than writing?

Use a precise visible detail as your content evidence. Then consider the supplied provenance and what the photograph can show about the enquiry. A single view has a limited frame; do not invent what happened outside it or assume that the photographer’s purpose is known unless evidence supports that claim.

How much should I quote?

Choose a short phrase that supports the point you will explain. A precise paraphrase or description of a visual feature can also identify evidence. Long copied passages leave less room for your reasoning and do not themselves show what the source is useful for.

Official guidance

1.
GCSE History Getting Started guide, updated June 2024
Pearson
2.
GCSE History specification, Issue 6, June 2024
Pearson
3.
Edexcel GCSE History top revision tips for students
Pearson
4.
GCSE History summer 2023 series feedback event
Pearson
5.
GCSE History 8145: Scheme of assessment
AQA
6.
Research review series: history
Ofsted

Other sources

1.
Sheffield soldier’s diary reveals the harrowing conditions of the Somme
National Army Museum

How to use mark schemes

Use examiner reports

Frequently asked questions

Official guidance

Other sources